Ring Wars and better uses of neuroscience advances

As you might have gathered from some of my posts over the past five years, I think secrecy is overrated.

I just saw something that could be interpreted to mean that oaths, covenants, and confidentiality agreements could be used to set up a circular war, a "ring war."

Instapundit used to mockingly talk about "circular firing squads" and the prisoners' dilemma (a hypothetical where prisoners can get a shorter sentence by all confessing but a longer one if they are the only wrongdoer who confesses, so they all stay quiet).

How do we end secrecy-dependent ring wars? Since people are going to respond to rational incentives, society needs to be change the prisoners' dilemma. Genuinely repentant wrongdoers should be given a lesser penalty for being the first to confess, especially if they help identify their co-conspirators. It should be a race to confess first.

How do we discern who is actually repentant from who is merely manipulative and insincere? There is a large body of neuromarketing research now on how to find out what people prefer. Use it in law enforcement. Also, use it in security clearances! If someone shows a preference for service to fellow humans, they should get jobs that need people with such a preference (as opposed to a preference for wielding power to use others). All that brain activity research should be put to uses more important than finding out which kind of cola we prefer.

Song title word "games"

Last year, the Eurovision submission from Israel was a song called "Hurricane." Cancellation of doubled letters turns that song title into "Hui Cane." Eight days after the Eurovision finale, Iran's president and foreign minister were killed in a helicopter crash. The helicopter was a Bell 212, which appears to be the kind of helicopter known as a "Huey." "Cain" is the first recorded murderer (see the book of Genesis in the Bible), something which would have been common knowledge to both Iranians and Israelis, despite their many differences.

If the 2024 song title was an announcement of an intended attack via helicopter crash, then we should all scrutinize the 2025 Israel song title being submitted to Eurovision now: "New Day Will Rise"

Doing cancellation of doubled letters on "New Day Will Rise" results in "NDA Y RS." 

An NDA is a non-disclosure agreement. "RS" is pronounced "ars," as in crafts and skilled arts. "Y" looks like a drover's rod for herding cattle. 

I've posted some articles recently that point to the development of technology that can "read" and "nudge" people's minds (see https://petticoatgovernment.blogspot.com/2025/02/mind-reading-can-be-done-by-technology.html cancellation), and I think someone in Israel is using this song title to tell the western world that this kind of technology is being used to herd us and that many who know about it are unable to openly discuss it due to non-disclosure agreements.

(As you look at Israelis demonstrating to show disgust and anger at their leaders for bombing tens of thousands of civilians in Gaza, remember that some of those Israelis likely know about any psy-ops being used to stoke conflicts but are prevented from saying anything about them. Violating confidentiality agreements in the military can result in prison and possibly worse consequences. Most Israelis are good people, and they need to be freed from their own captors.)

A scripture passage that was fulfilled despite looking on the surface as though it wasn't

In the Book of Mormon, 3 Nephi 21:9-10 says

For in that day, for my sake shall the Father work a work, which shall be a great and a marvelous work among them; and there shall be among them those who will not believe it, although a man shall declare it unto them. But behold, the life of my servant shall be in my hand; therefore they shall not hurt him, although he shall be marred because of them. Yet I will heal him, for I will show unto them that my wisdom is greater than the cunning of the devil.

This statement appears to be about Joseph Smith, Jr. But it says he wouldn't be "hurt," and Joseph Smith, Jr. was murdered by a mob in 1844 in Illinois. So wasn't this prophecy not fulfilled? Also, how can one be "marred" yet not "hurt"? That seems logically impossible.

The meaning of "mar" is 1) to ruin or diminish the perfection or wholeness of : spoil; 2) (archaic) a) to inflict serious bodily harm on; b) destroy. (See https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mar.)

Joseph Smith, Jr. repeatedly had serious bodily harm inflicted on him. He was never "perfect," so the first definition about "diminishing perfection" seems inapplicable to him.

My enormous old dictionary, in its etymology and meanings for the word "hurt", points to a lesser-known definition of "to hurt" as meaning "to check" or "to hamper" (see the 2b definition):

As we know from hockey, checking is blocking, not necessarily injuring (see definitions 5 and also 6):

The inclusion of abating as a synonym of checking is interesting. "Abate" is a strong word in its most common legal and construction usages, meaning to nullify or get rid of. See https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/abate.

The "check" meaning of "hurt" is kept in the first definition of "hurter":

I think this Book of Mormon passage above is saying that Joseph Smith, Jr. would be marred--both in the sense that he would suffer serious physical injury and that his work would be tarnished and slowed down, including by his unjust death--but that he and his work would not be entirely blocked. It has taken 200 years now, but his main work--the bringing forth of the Book of Mormon--still continues. The Book of Mormon tells the world that Jesus was divine and that he really rose from death (not just a chemical stupor like the fictional Juliet in Shakespeare's play Romeo and Juliet) and visited his "other sheep," i.e., people in the Americas.

Men in Black and Marbles

The news has been hot about President Trump yelling at President Zelenskyy in the White House recently. One tidbit stood out:

Volodymyr Zelenskyy was wearing black slacks, boots, and a black sweatshirt with an embroidered Ukrainian trident...."You're all decked out today," Donald Trump remarked mockingly.

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/did-zelenskyys-outfit-at-the-white-house-tick-off-donald-trump-heres-what-he-was-wearing-as-the-president-took-a-sarcastic-dig-at-him/ar-AA1A3xQS?ocid=BingNewsSerp

Zelensky was all in black, including a sweatshirt, for a very formal kind of meeting. What is the symbolism he was going for? To some people, "men in black" are pirates (who might be good guys underneath), as we see in The Princess Bride movie.

To others, "men in black" are super cool defenders of the universe from the really bad creatures out there.

But, as the movie and its rap song spell out for us, "Men In Black" equals "M.I.B."

Here come the Men In Black

It's the MIB's, uh, here come the MIB's

Here come the Men In Black, Men In Black

They won't let you remember*

Nah nah nah.

The good guys dress in black, remember that

Just in case we ever face to face and make contact

The title held by me, MIB

https://www.lyrics.com/lyric/3529257/Will+Smith

I was intrigued to find in my huge, old dictionary that "mib" means "mig" in the sense of a marble used for playing marbles. See https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mib.

Do you remember how, at the very end of the first Men in Black movie, the earth and our universe are portrayed as being inside a marble that an alien hand is playing marbles with? I don't think that was a lucky vocabulary coincidence. Is that final movie scene saying that the men in black are being "played with" just as much as everyone else? If so, who is playing everyone else? The technology we see and know about is like the visible tip of an iceberg, and I have felt myself "nudged" to do or say things in the past few years that I wouldn't have otherwise thought of doing or saying.

Of course, a "Mig" is also a USSR-era fighter jet.

So, when Trump makes a big deal out of Zelenskyy showing up dressed as a "mib"....what is really going on? There's so much that is unclear in international politics right now.

* If mind reading and altering technology has been being researched and patented since the mid-1970s (see https://patents.google.com/patent/US3951134A/en) then there has likely been progress on helping induce forgetfulness in targeted ways. Perhaps the movie Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind was only partially science fiction.

[Update 05/15/2025: Like most people, I notice more that which is salient to me (salient = of notable significance, standing out). I think that the reaction in our brain to that which is salient has been researched and most likely reverse-engineered so as to induce the reaction, possibly even in a heightened way, with new technology in order to nudge us in specific directions when we read news, ads, memes, etc. Try paying attention to what seems to stand out on your cell phone or computer screen and then to what seems to just sort of sit in the background without grabbing your attention; is there a difference?

Technology that can make some images and words salient while others on the same screen seem unimportant can be used to deliver messages, including messages that increase sadness or anxiety, in plausibly deniable ways. With AI doing the work, computer programs could mess with people's emotions and thoughts in ways that wouldn't even look harmful to other observers. 

Surely I'm not the first person to realize this kind of messaging could go from the realm of science fiction to reality, too. Maybe there is already widespread use of such tech and it partially explains why our society has become so polarized: some are pushed to feel threatened by a trend, and others are pushed to view is as a trivial or even positive change.]